RSFSR: in the liquidation of the colonial heritage of the peoples of Central Asia

Authors

  • Валентина Георгиевна Чеботарева

Keywords:

planning, industrialization, budget, People's Commissariat of Finance, patriarchal-feudal relations, subsidy, turnover tax

Abstract

Introduction: In the conditions of modern perestroika, modernization of relations in each of the newly formed independent states, a number of unreasonable demands and claims against Russia arise from the republics – the former constituent parts of the USSR. This publication is relevant in this regard. Its content reveals the nature of relations between the republics and the role of the RSFSR in these processes.

The author focuses on the formation and improvement of the economic system and the process of changing relations, primarily the RSFSR with the union republics, showing their direction and content. It is obvious that these relations were purposeful – to raise the role of the economic factor in the development and improvement of the situation in the republics. Often the RSFSR went even to the detriment of its constituent autonomies, territories and national districts, the state of its economy as a whole, in the name of realizing this promising task in the union republics. It is in this direction that the author focuses his attention. At the same time, it proceeds from the irrefutable position that the economy remained the determining factor in the development of the entire multinational power.

Methods. In recent years, the topic under study has not been deeply developed historically. At the same time, it is advisable in the conditions of the emergence of unfounded claims, Russophobia (Ukraine, the Baltic republics, Georgia, etc.) – the former constituent parts of a single union state, attracts attention.

In the course of preparing this article, the author relied primarily on the method of historicism, the information, historical-system method, the method of comparative analysis, etc. The reports of the people's commissariats of the financial and supervising the country's economic systems, as well as the media were used.

Author Biography

Валентина Георгиевна Чеботарева

Valentina G. Chebotareva, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Uzbek SSR

Moscow, Russia

vgchebotareva@mail.ru

References

Илларионов А. Экономический потенциал и уровни экономического раз-вития союзных республик // Вопросы экономики. – 1990. – № 4. – С. 49, 51, 58.

2. Куличенко М.И. Национальные отношения в СССР и тенденции их развития. – М., 1972. – С. 350.

Куличенко М.И. Образование и развитие Союза ССР. – Ереван, 1962. – С. 258.

Отчет Народного Комиссариата финансов об исполнении единого государственного бюджета СССР за 1933 г. – Л., 1935. – С. 143.

Там же. – С. 154.

Отчет Народного Комиссариата финансов Союза ССР об исполнении единого государственного бюджета СССР за 1929/30 г. – Л., 1932. – С. 17.

Переведенцев В. Рынок труда и миграция населения СССР // Вопросы экономики. – 1991. – № 9. – С. 49.

Плоды великого содружества. – Алма-Ата, 1968. – С. 47.

Там же. – С. 23, 28, 35, 37, 63.

Подсчитано по данным Отчетов Наркомфина СССР за 1929, 1932, 1934, 1935 гг.

Правда. 1994. 23 нояб.

Правда. 1994. 30 нояб.

Правда. 1994. 8 дек.

Ситарян С. Советская экономика глазами международных экспертов // Вопросы экономики. – 1991. – № 3. – С. 57.

Шредер Г. Экономические связи между республиками // Вопросы экономики. – 1992. – № 1. – С. 83.

Published

2022-04-29

Issue

Section

To the 100th anniversary of the formation of the USSR